Check out the following press release by New Zealand Government at 3:41 pm, 26 Apr 2010. It is erstounding that Nick Smith is keep paroting that the new clinical pathway is based on the Massey research - even though Massey has rejected this claim. Indeed, nothing in the Massey research resembles the new clinical pathway.
Continue reading "ACC Sensitive Claims Review Announced" »
Ah, I am having an ACC morning! I made the mistake googling ACC news and this is what get my little brain going:
By law, ACC can only accept sensitive claims from those diagnosed with a mental injury resulting from the sexual abuse they’ve suffered. Other agencies are available to assist sexual abuse survivors who have not developed a diagnosed mental injury. (See here the full news item)
The government has recently come up with the brilliant idea to involve victim support for SA survivors. What a great idea. They should be applauded. Certainly the board from ACC will be pleased having found someone who'll do ACC's work for nothing.
Continue reading "ACC And the 180 Degree Turn-Around" »
This is the second instalment of accounts from NZAP members of recent experiences with the SCU of ACC until February 2010. The stories which have been sent since the last report are included here.
While some claims were lodged before the introduction of the new pathway, they seem to be subjected to the same criteria as the new.
This is a very typical comment from therapists’ recent experience:
“At the Centre that I work from together with four other ACC registered psychotherapists, new ACC referrals are virtually non existent - and we are still having clients processed dating back to May with declines in almost all cases. These are the first declines ever in our history of over 15 years of ACC work!”
Recent experience of blocks to clients’ ability to access therapy are based on a number of factors. Some of these are listed here. The numbers relate to the itemised comments below from #53 onwards and in the previous post with stories collected until December 2009 from # 1 - 52.
Continue reading "ACC's Mishandling of Sexual Abuse Claims" »
This is the second instalment of accounts from NZAP members of recent experiences with the SCU of ACC until February 2010. The stories which have been sent since the last report are included here.
While some claims were lodged before the introduction of the new pathway, they seem to be subjected to the same criteria as the new.
This is a very typical comment from therapists’ recent experience:
“At the Centre that I work from together with four other ACC registered psychotherapists, new ACC referrals are virtually non existent - and we are still having clients processed dating back to May with declines in almost all cases. These are the first declines ever in our history of over 15 years of ACC work!”
Recent experience of blocks to clients’ ability to access therapy are based on a number of factors. Some of these are listed here. The numbers relate to the itemised comments below from #53 onwards and in the previous post with stories collected until December 2009 from # 1 - 52.
Continue reading "ACC's Mishandling of Sexual Abuse Claims" »
Media Statement from Lynne Pillay, Labour MP
Victims and survivors of sexual abuse are caught in a bureaucratic nightmare that has seen just 32 people approved for counselling nationally in the first two months of this year, Labour’s Victims Rights spokesperson Lynne Pillay says.
“In January and February 2009 ACC approved 472 sensitive claims enabling survivors of sexual abuse to access the counselling services they need. This year however just 32 people nationally have had their cases for counselling approved for the same period.
“While 112 people have had their cases for ACC support declined and hundreds of people are languishing in no man's land waiting for their claims to be processed,” Lynne Pillay said.
Continue reading "Nick Smith's Mismanagement Hurts CSA Survivors" »
Recent Comments